Everyone says Wuhan people have sacrificed and dedicated much, but do these guarantees justify their sacrifices? Listening to their complaints is also a form of respect.
The leaders of Wuhan should listen to this lady's curses especially to reflect on their formalism and bureaucracy. Hearing the curses, solve the problem, but also hear the depression of the people in the city hiding in it, going with a sense of redemption to retake and do the work in front of the curses. Rather than petty words, rather than a crisis; rather listen to curses, not cries. It's said that Wuhan people have sacrificed a lot, dedicated a lot, various guarantees meet their dedication? Listen to their curses, just like accepting their 'open window collective chorus', is also a respect for them.
Source:: zqb_caolin Writer/
A Wuhan lady's 'rant' went viral, sweeping across the country with her fiery energy and logical arguments, full of positive energy, conquering and healing many people, hailed as the 'Level 10 Rant'. Many self-media titles made it sensational today: it's a day when Wuhan people worship a 'rant', and attached a 'basic application guide for rants'. I am writing a commentary, commentary emphasizes rational language, although this rant is rough, irritable and not rational, I still think it is a great comment: no bending, no twisting, direct and outspoken, stripping away the flattery, rhetoric and face, let it flow freely expose some formalism, bureaucracy and ridiculous regulations in the anti-epidemic work, although the words are rough, the logic is not rough. This unvarnished truth, this unattractive but true words and coarse language, is more moving than those pretentious and elaborate words, empty rhetoric and correct nonsense, more appealing.
According to reports, Wuhan officials heard this rant and immediately convened a meeting with relevant departments and urged Centel to rectify, and there was a response soon. This is right, listen to such true words, it won't collapse.
I saw a table, let people fill in the table, let people take turns filling it in, I felt like I did so many things. — Isn't this the formalism of bureaucratic documents? Repeating this form, burning one's eyebrows, filling in forms, this lady just didn't say 'we want masks, not slogans; we want disinfectant, not water'.
Someone scolded a few words, you retorted and said, 'come and volunteer for the community', this kind of coercion volunteers, 'you do it if you can', the lady also refuted it very well. Someone didn't do things, did they? Did something done, did something they didn't do, why can't they complain? Didn't volunteer, can't speak? Couldn't they 'drop out' because of it?
When there was no disinfectant, where were you? When there was no alcohol, where were you? Now it's coming to build a group and let people take turns filling it in, making it feel like I've done a lot. — This is the formalism of bureaucratic documents. 'What if we don't eat meat'?
Pointing the finger at group purchases is just standing there talking, or rather, it's full of 'what if we don't eat meat' and foreign feelings, it's easy to blame people for buying in groups. After the city's various closures, if there is no unified supply, or if the official organization's supply does not keep up with the demand, how can people not buy in groups? Can't they be allowed to self-rescue? The residents cooperated to buy in groups, didn't add trouble to the community, this is a kind and stubborn self-rescue, is a good complement to the official grid distribution, should remind you to do a good job of protection, to minimize the risk, or to increase the community's living security, can't say this self-rescue is 'blindly buying in groups'.
Pointing the finger at group purchases is just standing there talking, or rather, it's full of 'what if we don't eat meat' and foreign feelings, it's easy to blame people for buying in groups. After the city's various closures, if there is no unified supply, or if the official organization's supply does not keep up with the demand, how can people not buy in groups? Can't they be allowed to self-rescue? The residents cooperated to buy in groups, didn't add trouble to the community, this is a kind and stubborn self-rescue, is a good complement to the official grid distribution, should remind you to do a good job of protection, to minimize the risk, or to increase the community's living security, can't say this self-rescue is 'blindly buying in groups'.
The leaders of Wuhan should listen to this lady's curses especially to reflect on their formalism and bureaucracy. Hearing the curses, solve the problem, but also hear the depression of the people in the city hiding in it, going with a sense of redemption to retake and do the work in front of the curses. Rather than petty words, rather than a crisis; rather listen to curses, not cries. It's said that Wuhan people have sacrificed a lot, dedicated a lot, various guarantees meet their dedication? Listen to their curses, just like accepting their 'open window collective chorus', is also a respect for them.
“”“”
